Skip to main content
added 1 character in body
Source Link
Ewan
  • 81.9k
  • 5
  • 86
  • 182

Regardless of other concerns, using a javascript library will only save you time (and ergo money) if you don't check the code, and every subsquentsubsequent update, for security risks.

So you are really asking yourself if you can trust the publisher of that particular library.

In my view this arguement really cuts out 99.999% of all libraries and the minor developer centric arguements fall away.

Regardless of other concerns, using a javascript library will only save you time (and ergo money) if you don't check the code, and every subsquent update, for security risks.

So you are really asking yourself if you can trust the publisher of that particular library.

In my view this arguement really cuts out 99.999% of all libraries and the minor developer centric arguements fall away.

Regardless of other concerns, using a javascript library will only save you time (and ergo money) if you don't check the code, and every subsequent update, for security risks.

So you are really asking yourself if you can trust the publisher of that particular library.

In my view this arguement really cuts out 99.999% of all libraries and the minor developer centric arguements fall away.

Source Link
Ewan
  • 81.9k
  • 5
  • 86
  • 182

Regardless of other concerns, using a javascript library will only save you time (and ergo money) if you don't check the code, and every subsquent update, for security risks.

So you are really asking yourself if you can trust the publisher of that particular library.

In my view this arguement really cuts out 99.999% of all libraries and the minor developer centric arguements fall away.